Democrats have raised questions about how Barr was so quickly able to boil down Mueller's report into four pages. "First is grand jury information..."
"But I am relying on my own discretion to make as much public as I can", he added.
Barr had said at the time he meant to release the full report, with redactions, by mid-April.
The issue came up as Barr testified before a Democratic-controlled House Appropriations subcommittee.
"This Congress voted unanimously to see that report", the subcommittee's chairman, Jose Serrano said, adding that he could not simply ignore the "elephant in the room". "That's something that has been really important to us".
His summary stated that Mueller did not find a criminal conspiracy between Russian Federation and Trump associates, and that Barr, along with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, did not find evidence to prove the president had obstructed justice. Barr and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein concluded the evidence Mueller presented did not amount to an obstruction charge.
"I think they did what they had to do". And when we see you taking sides against the law of the land, taking sides that we may not think is in the best interests of the American people, it troubles us'.Читайте также: FC Porto - Champions League - 10 April 2019
Barr said he gave the Mueller team a chance to review his summary of the Mueller report, but they declined.
Asked about reports that members of Mr Mueller's team were unhappy with his handling of the report, Mr Barr said he suspected any discontent may have reflected their desire to put out more information. He said he could be open to eventually releasing some of the redacted material after consulting with congressional leaders, but he drew a line against grand jury information, which would require court approval. House Democrats have demanded to see the full, unredacted report.
Information pertaining to secret grand jury testimony, ongoing investigations, classified intelligence, and un-indicted "peripheral players" will be redacted, Barr maintained. He said that he will colour-code the redactions and provide "explanatory notes" so people know why various sections of the report are not being disclosed. "You'll recall that the special counsel did spin off a number of cases that are still being pursued", Barr said.
Cartwright countered that Barr is devoting the Justice Department's "scarce resources" to the case. Barr's statement mentions $16 million for a vetting program for those who wish to enter or remain in the United States, something he says will help the government "identify terrorists, criminals and other nefarious actors". Attorney General William Barr is expected to release the report, but according to sources plans on redacting a significant portions of the report to account for a variety of possible issues.
They falsely claimed Mueller had exonerated Trump, painted House Democrats' investigations as partisan overreach and planned to target news outlets and individual reporters they believe promoted the collusion story.
"Even for someone who has done this job before", Lowey said, "I would argue it's more suspicious than impressive". "It's hard to have that discussion without the contents of the report, isn't it?" he said.
As Law & Crime's Ronn Blitzer reported, Barr was referring to McKeever v. Barr, decided on April 5.
This indicates that Barr is looking into allegations that Republican lawmakers have been pursuing for more than a year - that the investigation into President Donald Trump and possible collusion with Russian Federation was tainted at the start by anti-Trump bias in the FBI and Justice Department.При любом использовании материалов сайта и дочерних проектов, гиперссылка на обязательна.
«» 2007 - 2019 Copyright.
Автоматизированное извлечение информации сайта запрещено.
Код для вставки в блог